From: Potential for deep geological sequestration of CO2 in Switzerland: a first appraisal
Criterion | Classes [and relative scores in square brackets] | Weight | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |||
For evaluation of entire sediment stack at depth ≥800 m | ||||||
 1a | Depth to sealeda aquifers | >2,500 m [1] | 800–2,500 m [15] |  |  | 0.20 |
For evaluation of individual aquifers within 800–2,500 m depth interval | ||||||
 1b | Thickness of sealeda aquifer | ≤20 m [1] | Maximum thickness of formation [15] |  |  | 0.20 |
2 | Geothermal gradient | >35°C/km [1] | 30–35°C/km [8] | <30°C/km [15] |  | 0.15 |
3 | Hydrogeology | High complexity, poor knowledge [1] | Regional discharge zones [5] | Infiltration and transit zones [15] | Â | 0.15 |
4 | Exploration maturity | Unexplored [1] | Moderate [11] | High [15] | Â | 0.15 |
5 | Seismicity | Elevated [1] | Moderate [5] | Low [15] | Â | 0.10 |
6 | Fault systems | High density/active/favours leakage [1] | Buried/favours traps [8] | Limited faulting [15] | Â | 0.10 |
7 | Structural traps | Open-dipping structures [1] | Tilted faults, compartments [9] | Duplex structures [13] | Anticlinal structures [15] | 0.10 |
8 | Stress regime | Strike-slip to thrust faulting [1] | Strike-slip to normal faulting [15] | Â | Â | 0.05 |