Skip to main content

Table 6 Spectral coherence function (Coh), arithmetic mean of the specific storativity coefficient (\(\tilde{S}_{s}\)), amplitude of the pore pressure signal 1 (Az1), and of the pore pressure signal 2 (Az2), vertical effective amplitude hydraulic conductivity (\(\tilde{K}_{\upsilon }^{\text{Amp}}\)) and vertical effective phase hydraulic conductivity (\({\tilde{\text{K}}}_{\upsilon }^{\Delta \varphi }\)), effective dynamic porosity (ω) obtained for the M2 earth tide for different couples of sensors in BDB-1 borehole

From: Comparative study of methods to estimate hydraulic parameters in the hydraulically undisturbed Opalinus Clay (Switzerland)

Chamber

Coh

\(\tilde{S}_{s}\)

Az1

Az2

\(\Delta \varphi\)

\(\tilde{K}_{\upsilon }^{\text{Amp}}\)

\(\tilde{K}_{\text{v}}^{\Delta \varphi }\)

B

ω

ωwater loss

[−]

[m−1]

[bar]

[bar]

[rad]

[m s−1]

[m s−1]

[−]

[−]

[−]

I1 vs. I2

0.9985

1.8 × 10−6

8.35 × 10−4

1.70 × 10−3

−0.18220

4.7 × 10−8

7.2 × 10−7

0.2520

0.09

0.18

I2 vs. I2–3

0.9992

1.1 × 10−6

1.70 × 10−3

1.82 × 10−3

0.03573

2.5 × 10−6

1.0 × 10−5

1.0350

0.24

0.15

I2–3 vs. I3

0.9986

1.3 × 10−6

1.82 × 10−3

1.26 × 10−3

0.07658

1.4 × 10−7

3.3 × 10−6

0.3949

0.11

0.13

I3 vs. I4

0.9977

1.4 × 10−6

1.26 × 10−3

1.70 × 10−3

−0.06768

2.9 × 10−7

5.8 × 10−6

4.6810

1.33

0.12

I4 vs. I5

0.9930

1.2 × 10−6

1.70 × 10−3

1.67 × 10−3

0.02158

5.7 × 10−5

4.1 × 10−6

0.4758

0.12

0.14

I5 vs. I6

0.9965

1.4 × 10−6

1.67 × 10−3

1.28 × 10−3

−0.05037

6.4 × 10−7

1.8 × 10−5

0.2889

0.08

0.13

I6 vs. I7

0.9965

2.3 × 10−6

1.28 × 10−3

6.36 × 10−3

0.50810

3.9 × 10−8

7.3 × 10−8

1.6290

0.79

0.13

  1. Mean water-loss porosity (ωwater loss) is given for comparison purposes
  2. Shaded cells indicate spurious values