Skip to main content
Swiss Journal of Geosciences
Fig. 2 | Swiss Journal of Geosciences

Fig. 2

From: Palaeomagnetic and mineral magnetic analyses of the Deckenschotter of northern Switzerland and southern Germany

Fig. 2

Normalised magnetisation vs. demagnetisation steps of the final sample set. The range of demagnetisation curves is shown in colour-coded transparent areas. Typical features of the demagnetisation behaviour are illustrated as inferred trendlines (dashed lines). Demagnetisation curves diverging from the indicated trends of the respective sites are shown individually. a AF demagnetisation of TDS samples from CHO (n = 2), HUN (n = 5), ISS (n = 6). b AF demagnetisation of HDS samples from, EBN (n = 3), EGG (n = 4), HOC (n = 1), ROG (n = 3), UEK (n = 4). c TH demagnetisation of TDS samples from BRB (n = 3), GAE (n = 1), HUN (n = 2), ISS (n = 2). d TH demagnetisation of HDS samples from BOP (n = 8), EBN (n = 5), ROG (n = 10), UEK (n = 13). e TH demagnetisation of HDS samples from EGG (n = 4), HAS (n = 7), HOC (n = 6), SGI (n = 1); Please note that no trend is given for samples from HOC. All individual demagnetisation paths are available in (Scheidt et al., 2023)

Back to article page