Palaeomagnetic and mineral magnetic analyses of the Deckenschotter of northern Switzerland and southern Germany

Swiss Journal of Geosciences

Table 1 Basic information about the sites and the number of samples taken different depths level within each site

Site name	Site abbreviation	Unit	Region (in this study)	Depth level sampled	Samples analysed	CH1903 coordinates
Site name	Site abbreviation	Unit	Region (in this study)	Depth level sampled	Samples analysed	X	Y
Irchel Hochwacht	HOC	HDS	Irchel Plateau	9	23	686,075	268,269
Irchel Ebni	EBN	HDS	Irchel Plateau	6	13	687,007	267,577
Irchel Steig	SGI	HDS	Irchel Plateau	7	8	688,500	265,633
Irchel Hasli	HAS	HDS	Irchel Plateau	28	30	688,943	265,570
Uetliberg Kulm	UEK	HDS	Albis Ridge	15	31	679,605	244,805
Bürglen	BUE	HDS	Albis Ridge	6	11	683,435	234,430
Kiesgrube Tromsberg Kirchdorf	TRO	HDS	Dürn–Gländ–Egg	1	0	663,770	261,525
Egghalden Schleinikon	EGG	HDS	Dürn–Gländ–Egg	8	11	672,230	262,630
Boppelsen Cholholz	BOP	HDS	Dürn–Gländ–Egg	8	10	673,664 673,656	258,893 258,899
Feusi Oberwenigen	FEU	HDS	Dürn–Gländ–Egg	7	7	672,950	262,450
Roggenfeld Mettauertal	ROG	HDS^a	Lower Aare Valley	17	22	654,680	269,605
Ängi Mandach	GAE	TDS	Lower Aare Valley	2	2	656,610	267,925
Iberig Würenlingen	ISS	TDS	Lower Aare Valley	13	14	661,070	263,700
Bruggerberg Brugg	BRB	TDS	Lower Aare Valley	3	3	659,040 to 658,995	261,075 to 261,045
Cholfirst/Kiesgrube Chirchhölzli Laufen-Uhwiesen	CHO	TDS	Lake Constance–Schaffhausen	3	4	690,250	280,875
Hungerbol Öhningen	HUN	TDS	Lake Constance–Schaffhausen	29	47	708,100	282,505

The table is arranged according to the regions shown in Fig. 1 and in the order in which they are presented in this study
^aThe in geological maps established assignment of ROG to HDS is challenged in this study (see Sect. 4)