Skip to main content

Wide-gauge sauropod trackways from the Early Jurassic of Sichuan, China: oldest sauropod trackways from Asia with special emphasis on a specimen showing a narrow turn


An Early Jurassic sauropod dinosaur tracksite in the Lower Jurassic Zhenzhuchong Formation at the Changhebian site in Dazu County, Sichuan, is known to have yielded the trackway of a turning sauropod. A re-study of the site shows that all in all there are more than 100 tracks organized in at least three sauropod trackways. The narrow turn in one of the trackways is confirmed and analyzed in greater detail. All of the trackways show a wide gauge similar to Brontopodus-type trackways, but simultaneously exhibit high heteropody typical for Parabrontopodus-type trackways. The relative length of pes digits I, II and III is difficult to determine, but is suggestive of a primitive condition where digit I is less well developed than in Brontopodus. Thus far, they are the stratigraphically oldest sauropod trackways known from Asia being Hettangian in age. Previously, the trackway with the narrow turn was reported as the first turning sauropod trackway from Asia, but recently several other turning trackways have been reported suggesting that this behaviour is more commonly found than previously assumed and is now documented from the Early Jurassic to Late Cretaceous. Most of these examples show tight turns of between ~90° and as much as 180° suggesting that despite their large size sauropods could quite easily and abruptly change their direction of movement.


The locomotion of sauropod dinosaurs is a challenging question that can only be answered by integrating both data from skeletal remains and trackways. Preserved narrow- and wide-gauge sauropod trackways are essential for understanding the different gait of these tetrapods that, solely from skeletons, would remain widely obscure. This is also true for exceptional behaviour, for example when making sharp turns during walking. In Asia, most sauropod tracks are known from the Early Cretaceous, such as the large assemblages of tracks described from Korea (e.g., Lockley et al. 2006; Kim and Lockley 2012) and China (e.g., Lockley et al. 2002; 2014; Xing et al. 2014a), but also smaller assemblages as those from Thailand (Le Loeuff et al. 2002). By comparison the record of Jurassic sauropods tracks, especially Early Jurassic sauropod tracks, is scarce. In China, Early Cretaceous trackways of medium-sized (50 ≤ P’ML <75 cm) and large sauropods (P’ML >75 cm) nearly all have a medium to wide gauge pattern and have been referred to Brontopodus-type trackways (Xing et al. 2014a), while trackways of small sauropods have a narrow to medium gauge and are generally referred to Parabrontopodus-type trackways (Xing et al. 2015a). China’s so far scarce Early Jurassic sauropod track record is comprised primarily of Parabrontopodus-type trackways from the Lower Jurassic Ma’anshan Member of the Ziliujing Formation of Zigong City, Sichuan (Xing et al. 2014b); Liujianpus shunan and cf. Brontopodus-type trackwayss from the Lower Jurassic Daanzhai Member of Ziliujing Formation of Sichuan Province (Xing et al. 2015b); and sauropod trackways from the Changhebian tracksite, Chongqing (this paper). Additionally, a poorly-preserved Late Triassic Eosauropus trackway is known from the uppermost part of Xujiahe Formation of Longguan, Zigong City, Sichuan (Xing et al. 2014c).

In 1985, Yang Xinglong and Yang Daihuan from the Chongqing Nature Museum found nearly a hundred tracks of quadrupedal dinosaurs on top of a siltstone layer of the Lower Jurassic Zhenzhuchong Formation in Changhebian Village (GPS: 29°27′4.12″N, 105°46′59.92″E: see Fig. 1), Youting Town, Dazu County, Chongqing Municipality. Yang and Yang (1987) briefly reported this discovery when describing dinosaur tracks from the Sichuan Basin and suggested that prosauropods or stegosaurs were the most likely trackmakers. Following a brief study of the site in 2001 by Sino-Japanese-American expeditions, Lockley and Matsukawa (2009) published a partial map showing an area where a wide-gauge trackway exhibits a sharp left turn and they identified this trackway as of sauropod origin, stating that this appears to be the oldest sauropod trackway known from Asia. However, they did not provide a full description or discussion of the tracksite and all the three visible trackway segments. The main author of this paper investigated the locality again in 2011 and 2015, and the purpose of the present paper is to present a detailed update, description, and interpretation of this important Early Jurassic tracksite. Furthermore, the study gives rare insights into trackway pattern and gait variability of early sauropods when changing walking direction and performing a narrow turn.

Fig. 1

Geographical setting of the study area and the Changhebian sauropod tracksite in Dazu County, Sichuan Province, China

Geographical and geological setting

The Sichuan Basin contains Early, Middle, and Late Jurassic vertebrate fossils within a more than 3000 m thick depositional sequence (Lucas 2001). Peng et al. (2005) described the dinosaur fauna from Zigong area and established a biostratigraphic correlation scheme based on vertebrate fossils. In this scheme, two formations (Zhenzhuchong and Ziliujing) are identified as Early Jurassic, two (Xintiangou and Xiashaximiao) as Middle Jurassic, and three (Shangshaximiao, Suining, and Penglaizhen) as Late Jurassic.

Dazu County is located in the southeast of Sichuan Basin. The Changhebian tracksite is located 5 km northeast of Youting Town. The strata at the site mainly consist of (from bottom to top): abundant fluviatile sandstones from the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation which includes six members, with coal seams in the third and fifth members in the Youting area. Medium-thick layered siltstones, and fine-grained feldspar quartzitic sandstones with interbedded sandy mudstone form the Lower Jurassic Zhenzhuchong Formation (Hettangian) (Fig. 2). This sequence is capped by Holocene clays.

Fig. 2

Stratigraphic section of the Jurassic in the study area with the position of the sauropod track level of the Changhebian tracksite in the Lower Jurassic Zhenzhuchong Formation

The Zhenzhuchong Formation is a 17–68 m thick sequence of shallow lacustrine deposits (Peng et al. 2005), and the tracks are located in the layered siltstones. Abundant plant fossils have been found in the Zhenzhuchong Formation in the northeastern part of the Sichuan Basin, with flora assemblages characterized by ferns, cycads and conifers. This floral assemblage significantly differs from the underlying Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation (which consists of lycopods, bryophytes and articulatae) and shows features characteristic of the Early Jurassic (Liu et al. 2009). Qiyangia lilingensis (bivalve) and Palaeolimnadia baitianbaensis (conchostracans) also suggest that the Zhenzhuchong Formation is Early Jurassic in age (Chen et al., 2006). Chen et al. (2006) proposed that the Zhenzhuchong Formation of the Sichuan Basin and the Lower Lufeng Formation from Yunnan Province further south, are comparable to each other, while Barrett et al. (2007) suggested that the latter is ?Hettangian–?Sinemurian in age. The Zhenzhuchong vertebrate fauna includes the typical Lufengosaurus (prosauropod) fauna (Peng et al. 2005; Xing et al. 2014b). Dong et al. (1983) have described several fragmentary Lufengosaurus remains from the southwest portion and southern margin of Sichuan Basin.

Materials and methods


The beds of the Changhebian tracksite are inclined at approximately 45°, which required specialized mountaineering equipment to traverse and study the site in detail (Fig. 3). Therefore the China National Mountaineering Team and Zigong Search and Rescue Team contributed to the investigation. By anchoring ropes at the top of the outcrop, we accessed the tracks and catalogued and outlined them one by one with chalk. The entire tracksite was traced on a large-sized transparency film as well. These original drawings (CUGB-T20150720) are kept in the China University of Geosciences, Beijing. We copied the original transparency film, cut it into 1 m-wide strips, scanned these strips with a Hewlett-Packard Development Company (HP) SD Pro 44-in Scanner and constructed a complete digital map by Adobe Photoshop CS6 (see supplementary material). Using the ratios of width of the pes angulation pattern/maximum length of pes (WAP/P’ML) and width of the manus angulation pattern/maximum length of manus (WAM/M’ML), gauge (trackway width) was calculated for both pes and manus tracks (see Marty 2008; Marty et al. 2010a, b); Table 1). Marty (2008) and Marty et al. (2010a, b) have suggested that 1.0 can be used as an arbitrary threshold to distinguish narrow-gauge from medium-gauge trackways, while 1.2 can be used to divide medium-gauge and wide-gauge trackways, and a value above than 2.0 represents a very wide gauge. As noted by Xing et al. (2016), these categories are somewhat arbitrary divisions between the polar extremes of narrow- and wide-gauge trackways as originally defined by Farlow (1992) and Lockley et al. (1994), who did not, however, quantify these categories.

Fig. 3

Photograph of the Changhebian tracksite, Chongqing, China showing the steeply inclined track-bearing surface. The narrow turn of trackway CHB-S2 is clearly visible on the lower right. Trackways CHB-S1 and CHB-S3 are partially visible to the left of the normal fault, in the middle part of the photograph

Table 1 Measurements of sauropod trackway parameters from Changhebian site, Chongqing, China

The protection of the tracksite as a geological park is currently under discussion and study with local authorities.

The trackways

Material, horizon and locality

Trackway CHB-S1 comprises 28 pes and 16 manus tracks; trackway CHB-S2 22 pes and 11 manus tracks; trackway CHB-S3 7 pes and 7 manus tracks. All tracks remain in situ.

The trackways occur in the following horizon and location: Zhenzhuchong Formation (Early Jurassic), Changhebian Village, Youting Town, Dazu County, Chongqing Municipality, China.


Trackways CHB-S1, S2 & S3 are 15, 13.5, and 3.5 m long, respectively. Trackway CHB-S2 is the best preserved and exhibits a pronounced left turn towards the NW (Fig. 4, 5, 6). The CHB-S1 tracks are similar to the better-preserved CHB-S2 tracks, but slightly smaller in size. Trackway CHB-S3 is severely weathered; thus the morphology of the CHB-S1 or CHB-S3 tracks is not described in greater detail. However, the tracks of the S1 and S3 trackways are generally consistent with those from CHB-S2 from a morphological point of view and the three trackways are also similar regarding size (the average pes length of S1–S3 is 33.9, 35.9, and 34 cm) and trackway configuration. All three trackways represent quadrupedal progression, exhibiting all pes and corresponding manus tracks with only a few exceptions. Trackway S1 makes a small turn to the right but this turn is not nearly as tight and pronounced as the left turn in S2.

Fig. 4

Map with interpretative outline drawings (A) of the track-bearing level at the Changhebian site; and trackway midlines (B) of pes (solid line) and manus (dashed line), exhibiting the off-tracking phenomenon of the manus with regards to the pes. (Trackway midline defined by linking the midpoint of the line between centres of the left and right tracks)

Fig. 5

Photograph and outline drawing of well-preserved tracks from trackway CHB-S2, right after the narrow turn. The external position of RM8 and the atypical close position of LM7 to the rear part of LP8 are related to the turn

Fig. 6

Photograph (a), outline drawing (b), and low-angle light photograph (c) of the well-preserved pes-manus couple LP9-LM9 of trackway CHB-S2. Note the three well-developed and forwardly-oriented digit I-III impressions on the left pes track LP9. Digit I and V (not IV?) impressions are visible on the manus track LM9

The average pes length of CHB-S2 is 35.9 cm, the average width 27.7 cm, and the average L/W ratio is 1.3. The average manus length is 12.5 cm, the average width 24.4 cm, and the average L/W ratio is 0.5 (Table 1). The pes tracks of CHB-S2 are oval in shape and the manus crescent shaped. Most of the manus and pes tracks are rotated outwards relative to the trackway midline, and most of the time have a similar outward rotation, which is not “extremely” pronounced (see Figs. 4, 5, 6). Manus tracks are generally located in front of pes tracks, but some exceptions occur, notably within the turn, where some left manus tracks are located more inside with respect to the preceding pes track. The average outward rotation values for the manus and pes tracks are approximately 22° and 39°, respectively. The WAP/P’ML is 1.4, characterizing this trackway as wide-gauge sensu Marty (2008). The best-preserved pes–manus couple is CHB-S2-LP9 and LM9 (Fig. 6). The pes print LP9 is oval in shape, with a metatarso-phalangeal region narrower than the anterior region. Large, forwardly-directed claw mark impressions of digits I–III are present. The manus track LM9 is crescent shaped, digit I and V impressions are preserved, while the middle digit II and II impressions and the metacarpo-phalangeal region are indistinct. The heteropody (manus:pes area ratio) is high with a value of 1:3.1. The average pes pace angulation is 98°, while the average manus pace angulation is 80°.

CHB-S2 is a sauropod trackway with a very pronounced, narrow turn to the left (Figs. 3, 4). The turn itself is very narrow and consists of eleven pes and ten manus tracks: LP4-LM4 to LP9-LM9. In the middle of the turn, from RP5-RM5 on until approximately RP8, the trackway becomes much narrower (WAP/P’ML = 1.0) than in the non-turning part, where the trackway is clearly wide-gauge (WAP/P’ML = 1.2–1.7).

In the turning sequence, CHB-S2-LP6 and RP6 are almost parallel to each other, as are LP7 and RP7, which are also located very close to each other. LM6 is absent due to weathering, while LM7 is located close to the posterior part of LP8. The tracks between RP5 and RP7 are all located very close to each other, possibly indicating a slowing down in the middle of the turn. Another unusual feature is that some of the left pes tracks are turned inwards in the turning sequence, such as LP4, LP6, and LP7, while right pes tracks have a positive (outward) rotation throughout the turn and the entire trackway. Also the left manus tracks LM4, LM8 and LM10 are rotated inwards, while all right manus tracks are rotated outwards. This feature is similar to other turning sauropod trackways, like the TDGZ-S1 trackway from Tangdigezhuang tracksite, Shandong Province, China (Xing et al. 2015a), and this is obviously related to the turn.

For sauropods, Alexander (1976) first suggested that hip height was equal to 4 times of the foot length, whereas, later, Thulborn (1990) estimated hip height to be better estimated at 5.9 times the foot length. The relative stride length ratios of the CHB-S1 and S2 trackways are between 0.51–0.75, 0.56–0.83. Using the equation to estimate speed from trackways (Alexander 1976), the mean locomotion speed of the trackmakers was between 1.3–2.02 (CHB-S1) and 1.58–2.48 km/h (CHB-S2), indicating a slow walk.



Gauge is often used to distinguish the two typical, major groups (narrow gauge mainly in the Jurassic; wide gauge mainly in the Cretaceous) sauropod trackways (Farlow 1992; Lockley et al. 1994; Wilson and Carrano 1999; Santos et al. 2009; Marty et al. 2010a; Castanera et al. 2014), even if some trackways show changes from narrow to wide gauge along trackway course (e.g., Marty et al. 2010b; Castanera et al. 2012).

The three trackways from the Changhebian site are all wide-gauge trackways, apart from the turn in trackway CBH-S2. Regarding the wide gauge and the rather moderate outward rotation of manus tracks, the Changhebian sauropod trackways resemble the Brontopodus-type trackways. The high degree of heteropody on the other hand is typical for Parabrontopodus narrow-gauge trackways (Lockley et al. 1994), while the configuration of the three prominent and forwardly-directed digit impressions is not as the type description of Parabrontopodus stating that the digits are ‘strongly outwardly rotated’ (Lockley et al., 1994).

On the other hand, the Changhebian sauropod trackways also differ from the recently named sauropod medium-gauge ichnotaxon Liujianpus (Xing et al. 2015d) from the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation. Liujianpus shows a combination of features shared with both Otozoum and Brontopodus (Rainforth 2003; Lockley et al. 1994) and has elongate pes digit traces oriented subparallel to the pes axis and a sub-circular manus with five discrete blunt digit traces. A small wide-gauge “Brontopodus-type” trackway JYS11 (Xing et al. 2015b) was found at the same site as Liujianpus. JYS11 has a mean pes length of 26.4 cm and is quite similar to the Changhebian sauropod trackways regarding track morphology.

It is also noteworthy that even some other Early Jurassic prosauropod trackways have a wide gauge (Ishigaki 1988; Farlow 1992; Lockley 2001).

Finally, the Changhebian sauropod trackways are clearly distinct from Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Chinese Parabrontopodus-type trackways, which are narrow to medium gauge and have a more pronounced outward-rotated manus (Xing et al. 2015a).

For these reasons and because the Changhebian trackways share typical characteristics of both Parabrontopodus and Brontopodus, we refrain from assigning these trackways to one of these ichnotaxa. Nonetheless, we believe that the Changhebian trackways—despite their wide gauge—are more closely related to Parabrontopodus, Lavinipes or other unnamed sauropod trackways from the Early Jurassic (see also Fig. 9 of Avanzini et al. 2003), as they have a high heteropody.

We easily rule out a thyreophoran origin (Deltapodus and Shenmuichnus ichnotaxa), as Deltapodus typically has three round and blunt digits and a pronounced narrowing of the heel (Whyte and Romano 2001; Xing et al. 2013) and this is not the case in the Changhebian trackways. Shenmuichnus tracks are clearly tridactyl (Li et al. 2012).

The occurrence of Early Jurassic wide-gauge, “Brontopodus-type” trackways suggests that several basal eusauropods, such as Patagosaurus, Volkheimeria, Cetiosaurus, Cetiosauriscus, and Turiasaurus (Upchurch et al. 2004; Royo-Torres et al. 2006), could possibly have left wide-gauge trackways. Wilson and Carrano (1999) and Santos et al. (2009) have inferred some wide gauge-trackmaker features, such as: wider sacra, limb morphologies suggesting an outwardly-angled limb posture, and increased eccentricity of the femoral midshaft.

Present evidence indicates a great diversity of Early Jurassic sauropodomorphs in Southwest China (Sichuan and Chongqing). Skeletal fossils include Lufengosaurus (prosauropod) (Dong et al. 1983), and the track records narrow-gauge Parabrontopodus tracks (Xing et al. 2015a), Liujianpus tracks, and wide-gauge Brontopodus-type tracks (Xing et al. 2015b).

Trackmaker identification

The sauropodomorph dinosaurs are well known in southern China from the Early Jurassic. For example, the basal sauropodomorph Lufengosaurus (Young 1941) and Yunnanosaurus (Young 1942) are abundant in Yunnan Province, and also have several records in Sichuan Province (Dong 1984). Sauropod remains are far less common, but include, for example, the basal sauropod Gongxianosaurus (He et al. 1998) and the eusauropod Tonganosaurus (Li et al. 2010).

Where tracks are sufficiently well preserved it should be easy to differentiate Lufengosaurus-like trackmakers from those that have left Brontopodus-type trackways. Tracks of the former genus have digit I impressions shorter than digit III, that tend to be oriented anteriorly, whereas the latter have digit I traces larger than digit III, with stringer outward rotation. The track LP9 shown in Figs. 5 and 6 indicates that digit I is shorter than digit III, and more prosauropod-like than typical sauropod tracks (Brontopodus type). However, it is probable that in comparison with more derived sauropods, the more basal sauropods would have had digit I less strongly developed in comparison with digit III. For example in the pes of Shunosaurus digit I is shorter than digit II and about the same length as digit II (Zhang 1988). Wright (2005, p. 256) illustrated hypothetical footprints made by different sauropod groups but noted that “no basal sauropod (e.g., Vulcanodon) tracks have been discovered.” Moreover, her reconstruction of a possible Vulcanodon track is much more like a prosauropod track (e.g., Otozoum or Liujianpus) than any confirmed Brontopodus-like sauropod track.

Turn of trackway CHB-S2

Ishigaki and Matsumoto (2009) have reported what they called an “off-tracking phenomenon” for the trackway ‘Tu’ of the Iouaridène tracksite (Late Jurassic, Morocco). Sauropod trackway no. 6 of the Zhaojue tracksite, Sichuan Province (Xing et al. 2015b), and trackway TDGZ-S1 from the Tangdigezhuang tracksite, Shandong Province, China (Xing et al. 2015c) also show a similar “off-tracking” phenomenon, and Xing et al. (2015c) also discuss “off-tracking” in further detail. CHB-S2 has a much less obvious “off-tracking” and this may be related to the very tight turn and abrupt change in direction. An explanation could be that the animal slowed down to almost standing still before changing the direction. This would also explain why the tracks between RP5 and RP7 are located very close to each other. Accordingly, “off-tracking” may only have occurred sauropods make rather large and continuous turns without too much of deceleration. However, a verification of such hypotheses requires more detailed studies that aim to show a quantitative correlation between variations in stride length and trackway curvature, and that cite appropriate behavioral support (in extant quadrupeds) for a correlation between stride length and speed.

Overview on turning sauropod trackways

Recent studies have shown that turning sauropod trackways are more common than previously known. The first report appears to have been an unpublished 1987 photo of trackways from the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Fumanya region of Spain (Vila et al. 2008) which shows three turns, the first two being relatively abrupt (sharp) turns approximating 90° and the third, also abrupt (sharp) and almost 180°.

The second report is the Lommiswil tracksite in the Jura Mountains in Switzerland. Published in Meyer 1990 (Fig. 2, trackway 6), and 1993 (Fig. 4, unnumbered trackway) are two wide-gauge (partially pes-only) sauropod trackways with abrupt and round turns.

The third report, from the Morrison Formation (Late Jurassic) at the Valley City site in Utah (Lockley and Hunt 1995, Fig. 4.45), later named the Copper Ridge site, shows a turn of nearly 90°. The initial report of the Changhebian site discussed here thus appears to have been the fourth and the oldest report of a sauropod turn, providing evidence of a turn of about 120–130°.

More recently, a large site from the Lower Cretaceous Feitianshan Formation of the Zhaojue area, Sichuan, yielded a turning trackway with an abrupt 180° turn (Xing et al. 2015b), and a site from the Early Cretaceous Dasheng Group, of Shandong Province a rather wide or broad semicircular turn of almost 180° (Xing et al. 2015c). Another trackway with even two quite pronounced turns is figured in Castanera et al. 2014 (Fig. 2, trackway PM-N5-P2). Several Late Jurassic turning trackways were excavated and documented by the Palaeontology A16 on Highway A16, but most of these are not published as yet, but see Stevens et al. 2016, Fig. 13.7 for an example of a sauropod trackway with a very narrow and round turn. Trackways with rather slight turns are more frequent, as almost no trackway is really straight. Good examples of trackways with rather slight turns are “G7” and “PM-N5-P3” shown in Fig. 2 in Castanera et al. (2014).

Notable among these reports are the very sharp or abrupt (~180°) turns reported at the Spanish site (Castanera et al. 2012) and at the Zhaojue site. In comparison the turn made by the Changhebian sauropod is less pronounced (~120–130°) as is the one from Utah (~80°). In the global sauropod trackway record there are many sites where sauropod trackways deviate from straight lines. However, in the samples cited here, all the trackways show turns of between ~89° and ~180° in short distances of no more than about 3–5 m.

We consider the sample too small to draw any new conclusions about sauropod turning behaviour and locomotion at present. At least, it is evident that despite their large size sauropods could make abrupt and narrow turns over a few meters only. A larger sample of well-preserved trackways of narrow and wide gauge sauropod making turns with different curvatures, analysed with more sophisticated and statistical analysis tools (see also Stevens et al. 2016) would be required to draw any further conclusions about the gaits involved in such turns.

To summarize, these reports span sites dating from the Early Jurassic to Late Cretaceous. Although the sample is still small this represents a wide time span and the records are from three different continents.


  1. 1.

    It’s confirmed that the Changhebian tracksite reveals the oldest sauropod dinosaur trackways in Asia.

  2. 2.

    The trackways share typical characteristics of wide-gauge Brontopodus-type (wide gauge) and narrow-gauge Parabrontopodus-type trackways (high heteropody) and include one example of an individual that made an abrupt and narrow turn (~120°–130°).

  3. 3.

    The relative length of pes digits I, II and III is difficult to determine, but is suggestive of a primitive condition where digit I is less well developed than in Brontopodus-type pes tracks.

  4. 4.

    This is another example that shows that trackway gauge is related to behaviour and may change along a single trackway course, in the present case within the turn.

  5. 5.

    This is the oldest example of a trackway of a turning sauropod, which combined with several other well-documented examples, shows that various groups of sauropod trackmakers ranging in age from Early Jurassic to Late Cretaceous, were capable to do tight turns over a couple of meters only.

  6. 6.

    Trackways of turning sauropods are now widely distributed in time (Early Jurassic to Late Cretaceous) and space (Asia, Europe and North America). Although they are still not often reported, they seem to be more common than previously assumed and will be important in analyses on sauropod locomotion from trackways.



Changhebian track locality, Chongqing, China


China University of Geosciences, Beijing










Maximum length of pes


Maximum length of manus


Width of the manus angulation pattern


Width of the pes angulation pattern


  1. Alexander, R. (1976). Estimates of speeds of dinosaurs. Nature, 261, 129–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avanzini, M., Leonardi, G., & Mietto, P. (2003). Lavinipes cheminii ichnogen. ichnosp. nov., a possible sauropodomorph track from the Lower Jurassic of the Italian Alps. Ichnos, 10, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett, P. M., Upchurch, P., Zhou, X. D., & Wang, X. L. (2007). The skull of Yunnanosaurus huangi Young, 1942 (Dinosauria: Prosauropoda) from the Lower Lufeng Formation (Lower Jurassic) of Yunnan, China. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 150, 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castanera, D., Pascual, C., Canudo, J. I., Hernandez, N., & Barco, J. L. (2012). Ethological variations in gauge in sauropod trackways from the Berriasian of Spain. Lethaia, 45, 476–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castanera, D., Vila, B., Razzollini, N. L., Santos, V. F., Pascual, C., & Canudo, J. I. (2014). Sauropod trackways of the Iberian Peninsula: palaeoetological and palaeoenvironmental implications. Journal of Iberian Geology, 40, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, P. J., Li, J., Matsukawa, M., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., & Lockley, M. G. (2006). Geological ages of dinosaur–track–bearing formations in China. Cretaceous Research, 27(1), 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong, Z. M. (1984). A new prosauropod from Ziliujing formation of Sichuan Basin. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 22(4), 310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, Z., Zhou, S. & Zhang, Y., 1983: The Dinosaurian Remains from Sichuan Basin, China: Palaeontologia Sinica, whole number 162, new series C, 23, 1–145.

  9. Farlow, J. O. (1992). Sauropod tracks and trackmakers: integrating the ichnological and skeletal records. Zubia, 10, 89–138.

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, X. L., Wang, C. S., & Liu, S. Z. (1998). A new species of sauropod from the Early Jurassic of Gongxian County, Sichuan. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 18(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishigaki, S. (1988). Les empreintes de Dinosaures du Jurassique inférieur du Haut Atlas central marocain: Notes du Service géologique du Maroc (pp. 79–86).

  12. Ishigaki, S., & Matsumoto, Y. (2009). “Off–tracking”–like phenomenon observed in the turning sauropod trackway from the Upper Jurassic of Morocco. Memoir of the Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum, 8, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J. Y., & Lockley, M. G. (2012). New sauropod tracks (Brontopodus pentadactylus ichnosp. nov.) and from the Early Cretaceous Haman Formation of Jinju area, Korea: implications for sauropods manus morphology. Ichnos, 19, 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Loeuff, J., Khansubha, S., Buffetaut, E., Sutethorn, V., Tong, H., & Souillat, C. (2002). Dinosaur footprints from the Phra Wihan Formation (Early Cretaceous of Thailand). Comptes Rendus Palevol, 1, 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, J., Lockley, M. G., Zhang, Y. G., Hu, S. M., Matsukawa, M., & Bai, Z. Q. (2012). An important ornithischian tracksite in the Early Jurassic of the Shenmu Region, Shaanxi, China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 86, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, K., Yang, C. Y., Liu, J., & Wang, Z. X. (2010). A new sauropod dinosaur from the Lower Jurassic of Huili, Sichuan, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 48(3), 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, D. D., Yang, Z. R., Yang, Y. D., Bao, Y. Y., & Liu, B. (2009). Characteristic of the Flora in the Zhenzhuchong Formation and the Jurassic–Triassic Boundary in the Sichuan Basin. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 31(3), 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lockley, M. G. (2001). Trackways-dinosaur locomotion p. In D. E. G. Briggs & P. Crowther (Eds.), Paleobiology: A synthesis (pp. 412–416). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lockley, M. G., Farlow, J. O., & Meyer, C. A. (1994). Brontopodus and Parabrontopodus ichnogen. nov. and the significance of wide- and narrow-gauge sauropod trackways. Gaia, 10, 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lockley, M. G., Houck, K., Yang, S. Y., Matsukawa, M., & Lim, S. K. (2006). Dinosaur dominated footprint assemblages from the Cretaceous Jindong Formation, Hallayo Haesang National Park, Goseong County, South Korea: evidence and implications. Cretaceous Research, 27, 70–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lockley, M. G., & Hunt, A. P. (1995). Dinosaur tracks and other fossil footprints of the western United States (p. 338). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lockley, M. G., & Matsukawa, M. (2009). A review of vertebrate track distributions in East and Southeast Asia. Journal Paleontological Society of Korea, 25, 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lockley, M. G., Wright, J., White, D., Matsukawa, M., Li, J., Feng, L., et al. (2002). The first sauropod trackways from China. Cretaceous Research, 23, 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lockley, M. G., Xing, L. D., Kim, J. Y., & Matsukawa, M. (2014). Tracking Early Cretaceous Dinosaurs in China: a new database for comparison with ichnofaunal data from Korea, the Americas and Europe. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113, 770–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lucas, S. G. (2001). Chinese fossil vertebrates. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marty, D., Belvedere, M., Meyer, C. A., Mietto, P., Paratte, G., Lovis, C., et al. (2010a). Comparative analysis of Late Jurassic sauropod trackways from the Jura Mountains (NW Switzerland) and the central High Atlas Mountains (Morocco): implications for sauropod ichnotaxonomy. Historical Biology, 22, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marty, D., Paratte, G., Lovis, C., Jacquemet, M. & Meyer, C.A. (2010b). Extraordinary sauropod trackways from the Late Jurassic Béchat Bovais tracksite (Canton Jura, NW Switzerland): implications for sauropod locomotor styles. In 8th Swiss Geoscience Meeting (p. 120), 19.–20.11.2010, Fribourg, Switzerland.

  28. Meyer, C. A. (1990). Sauropod tracks from the Upper Jurassic Reuchenette Formation (Kimmeridgian, Lommiswil, Kt. Solothurn) of northern Switzerland. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 82, 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer, C. A. (1993). A sauropod dinosaur megatracksite from the Late Jurassic of northern Switzerland. Ichnos, 3, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng, G. Z., Ye, Y., Gao, Y. H., Shu, C. K., & Jiang, S. (2005). Jurassic Dinosaur Faunas in Zigong. Chengdu: People’s Publishing House of Sichuan. 236 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rainforth, E. C. (2003). Revision and re-evaluation of the Early Jurassic dinosaurian ichnogenus Otozoum. Palaeontology, 46(4), 803–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Royo-Torres, R., Cobos, A., & Alcala, L. (2006). A giant European dinosaur and a new sauropod clade. Science, 314, 1925–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Santos, V. F., Moratalla, J. J., & Royo-Torres, R. (2009). New sauropod trackways from the Middle Jurassic of Portugal. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 54, 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stevens, K. A., Ernst, S., & Marty, D. (2016). Uncertainty and ambiguity in the interpretation of sauropod trackways. In P. Falkingham, D. Marty, & A. Richter (Eds.), Dinosaur tracks—The next steps (pp. 227–243). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thulborn, T. (1990). Dinosaur Tracks (p. 410). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M., & Dodson, P. (2004). Sauropoda. In D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, & H. Osmolska (Eds.), The Dinosauria (Chapt. 13, 2nd ed., pp. 259–322). Orlando: California University Press.

  37. Vila, B., Oms, O., Marmi, J., & Galobart, A. (2008). Tracking Fumanya footprints (Maastrichtian, Pyrenees): historical and ichnological overview. Oryctos, 8, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Whyte, M. A., & Romano, M. (2001). Probable stegosaurian dinosaur tracks from the Saltwick Formation (Middle Jurassic) of Yorkshire. In Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, England (Vol. 112, pp. 45–54).

  39. Wilson, J. A., & Carrano, M. T. (1999). Titanosaurs and the origin of “wide-gauge” trackways: a biomechanical and systematic perspective on sauropod locomotion. Paleobiology, 25, 252–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xing, L. D., Lockley, M. G., Bonnan, M. F., Marty, D., Klein, H., Liu, Y. Q., et al. (2015a). Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous trackways of small–sized sauropods from China: New discoveries, ichnotaxonomy and sauropod manus morphology. Cretaceous Research, 56, 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xing, L. D., Lockley, M. G., Marty, D., Pinuela, L., Klein, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2015b). Re-description of the partially collapsed Early Cretaceous Zhaojue dinosaur tracksite (Sichuan Province, China) by using previously registered video coverage. Cretaceous Research, 52, 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Xing, L. D., Lockley, M. G., McCrea, R. T., Gierliński, G. D., Buckley, L. G., Zhang, J. P., et al. (2013). First record of Deltapodus tracks from the Early Cretaceous of China. Cretaceous Research, 42, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xing, L. D., Lockley, M. G., Yang, G., Cao, J., McCrea, R. T., Klein, H., Zhang, J. P., Persons, W. S. IV, Dai, H. (2016). A diversified vertebrate ichnite fauna from the Feitianshan Formation (Lower Cretaceous) of southwestern Sichuan, China. Cretaceous Research, 57, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xing, L. D., Lockley, M. G., Zhang, J., Klein, H., Li, D., Miyashita, T., et al. (2015c). A new sauropodomorph ichnogenus from the Lower Jurassic of Sichuan, China fills a gap in the track record. Historical Biology,. doi:10.1080/08912963.2015.1052427.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Xing, L. D., Lockley, M. G., Zhang, J. P., Klein, H., Persons, W. S. I. V., & Dai, H. (2014a). Diverse sauropod-, theropod-, and ornithopod-track assemblages and a new ichnotaxon Siamopodus xui ichnosp. nov. from the Feitianshan Formation, Lower Cretaceous of Sichuan Province, southwest China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 414, 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xing, L. D., Marty, D., Wang, K., Lockley, M. G., Chen, S., Xu, X., et al. (2015d). An unusual sauropod turning trackway from the Early Cretaceous of Shandong Province, China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 437, 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xing, L. D., Peng, G. Z., Marty, D., Ye, Y., Klein, H., Li, J. J., et al. (2014b). An unusual trackway of a possibly bipedal archosaur from the Late Triassic of the Sichuan Basin, China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 59(4), 863–871.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Xing, L. D., Peng, G. Z., Ye, Y., Lockley, M. G., Klein, H., Persons, W. S. I. V., et al. (2014c). Sauropod and small theropod tracks from the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation of Zigong City, Sichuan, China with an overview of Triassic-Jurassic dinosaur fossils and footprints of the Sichuan Basin. Ichnos, 21, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Marty, D. (2008). Sedimentology, taphonomy, and ichnology of Late Jurassic dinosaur tracks from the Jura carbonate platform (Chevenez-Combe Ronde tracksite, NW Switzerland): insights into the tidal-flat palaeoenvironment and dinosaur diversity, locomotion, and palaeoecology. GeoFocus, 21, 278.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wright, J. (2005). Steps in understanding sauropod biology: The importance of sauropod tracks. In K. A. Curry Rogers & J. A. Wilson (Eds.), The sauropods: evolution and paleobiology (pp. 252–284). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yang, X., & Yang, D. (1987). Dinosaur Footprints from Mesozoic of Sichuan Basin (p. 30). Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Young, C. C. (1941). A complete osteology of Lufengosaurus huenei Young (gen. et sp. nov.) from Lufeng, Yunnan, China. Palaeontologia Sinica (New Series C), 7, 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Young, C. C. (1942). Yunnanosaurus huangi Young (gen. et sp. nov.), a new Prosauropoda from the red beds at Lufeng, Yunnan. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China, 22(1–2), 63–104.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang, Y. (1988). The Middle Jurassic dinosaur fauna from Dashanpu, Zigong, Sichuan. Sauropod Dinosaurs. In: Shunosaurus (Vol. 3, p. 89). Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Publishing House.

Download references


This research was supported the 2013 and 2015 support fund for graduate students’ science and technology innovation from China University of Geosciences (Beijing), China. We acknowledge valuable comments of two anonymous reviewers and associate editor Jean-Paul Billon-Bruyat that helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lida Xing.

Additional information

Editorial handling: J.-P. Billon-Bruyat and A. G. Milnes.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.


Supplementary material: Detailed map with interpretative outline drawings of the track-bearing level at the Changhebian site. Digitized based on a scan of a 1:1 drawing of the site made on transparent film. (TIFF 1821 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xing, L., Lockley, M.G., Marty, D. et al. Wide-gauge sauropod trackways from the Early Jurassic of Sichuan, China: oldest sauropod trackways from Asia with special emphasis on a specimen showing a narrow turn. Swiss J Geosci 109, 415–428 (2016).

Download citation


  • Sauropod tracks
  • Turning trackway
  • China
  • Dinosaur locomotion
  • Zhenzhuchong Formation
  • Early Jurassic